Obama’s devoted supporters have tried everything, from repeated applications of Alinskyite ridicule to silent refusals to even acknowledge its existence, to get the issue of Barack Obama’s ineligibility to hold the office of President of the United States to go away. My belief that Barack Obama does not meet the eligibility requirements of Article II of the Constitution has nothing to do with the many questions swirling around the President’s birth certificate, although I do concede that it’s highly unusual for a person to be born in two different hospitals. Rather, I don’t care if he was born in the Capitol Rotunda. If he is indeed the son of a Kenyan Marxist bigamist, he cannot be an Article II “natural born citizen.” End of story. Perhaps, though, we need to revisit that question. What if Barack Obama Sr. was not Barack the Younger’s father? What if his father was an American citizen at the time that the future Barry Soetoro was born? In his new film, “Dreams from my Real Father: a Story of Reds and Deception,” our guest, Joel Gilbert, the president of Highway 61 Entertainment, asserts just that; specifically, that Barack Obama is not the son of Barack Obama Sr.and Stanley Ann Dunham. Instead, the answer to the question “Barack, who’s your daddy?” is Frank Marshall Davis.
The mayors of Boston, Chicago and San Francisco present a coast-to-coast troika of stupidity, and illegality, by demonizing fast-food chain Chick-Fil-A because its CEO pleads guilty as charged to the modern-day crime of supporting traditional marriage. Meanwhile, another CEO and his wife donate $2.5 million to support Washington state’s so-called “same sex marriage” legislation to universal silence. Why the difference?
As the desperation mounts and panic sets in at Obama headquarters, their mouthpieces descend even further into unintentional farce. The latest example is the ridiculous spectacle of the Jurassic media’s endless bleating about Mitt Romney’s “horrific stumbling” at the Olympics in London. Hearing them go on, you’d almost think that his linebacker wife had manhandled the Queen after they presented her with an iPod featuring Romney speeches.
Tune in today for the rest of the story.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks to all of you who voted for the Teri O’Brien Show as Talk Show of the Year on Red State Talk Radio. We won! We really appreciate your encouragement and support!
Politics, Pop Culture, the Hottest Issues of the Day, and Your calls. The Teri O’Brien Show, featuring America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess, Live and in color, Sundays 4-6 pm Central time at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Teri-OBrien. Daring to Commit Common Sense, Fearlessly, and More Important, Cheerfully, in the Age of Obama.
Make My Day: Text “FAN TOBCWP” to 32665
Can’t listen live? Download it from iTunes and listen on demand.
As one listener wrote “one of the most insightful and entertaining pundits in America. Also, her voice is magical.”
Serious Ideas, Irresistible Entertainment. Warning: listeners may become hopelessly addicted.







Today at 4:00 PM Central Time on Blogtalkradio.com
http://teriobrien.com/2012/07/29/dreams-from-his-real-father-today-on-the-teri-obrien-show/
Teri, it must really bug you that your “Article II” argument is completely irrelevant. Why not say he cannot be president because he isn’t tall enough? If it was a relevant criterion, there would be credible legal objections to him by all sides.
From Teri O’Brien Dreams from His Real Father: Today on the Teri O’Brien Show http://t.co/7EfZmOiF
Gee, Garnet, I wasn’t aware that there’s a provision in the U.S. Constitution regarding a height requirement. Please cite the specific provision. In the meantime, I’ll take comfort in knowing that Michael Bloomberg is probably ineligible.
Teri, it’s called sarcasm. I’m saying that the height argument is as relevant as yours. Since we don’t agree, why don’t we just skip ahead to the part where you explain WHY no one has successfully used your argument? Let me guess, only you and your fellow foil hat birthers have figured it out, right? Oh wait, maybe there’s a conspiracy theory angle. Yes! The Republicans WANT to face Obama, so they don’t want him excluded as ineligible, and Hillary WANTED to lose. Oh if only there weren’t such a shortage of lawyers to take up your case. Wait, didn’t you go to law school? Why not file a lawsuit if you believe what you say?