If you tune in to the 24/7 televised insane asylum, MS-NBC, (and I don’t recommend that because, as you know, I watch so you don’t have to), at various times of day, you’ll see a slit-eyed, fat man, or a TelePrompTer-challenged race hustler, or a pasty-faced guilty white liberal screamer yelling about the unfairness of requiring photo ID for those seeking to vote. They claim that these provisions are unnecessary because vote fraud is virtually non-existent. I consider that assertion ridiculous on its face, and in fact, I understand that these people oppose voter ID precisely because it would prevent some of the vote fraud that democrat big city machines use to steal elections. Remember Al Sharpton’s friend Melowese Richardson who admitted voting illegally, did time for it, and justified it because of Barack Obama’s “right” to be president?
Democrat vote fraud is a fact, but what if we concede, for the sake of argument that they are correct. What about someone who is allowed to vote by mistake? The Wall Street Journal tells us about a report in the Liberal Death Star about new American citizen Mario Hernandez.
Fifty-eight-year-old Mario Hernandez was born in Cuba and came to the U.S. with his parents in the 1960s, a few years after his native land was taken over by communists. This Wednesday, the New York Times reports from Miami, he became an American citizen: “It turns out that Mr. Hernandez, despite having voted in every major election since Jimmy Carter’s in 1976 and working for two state agencies and two federal agencies, including as a longtime supervisor for the Bureau of Prisons, was not even a United States resident.”
What went wrong? It’s a story of personal oversight and bureaucratic incompetence. On his arrival, he “was given open-ended parole, which allowed him to live and work in the United States but did not make him a [legal] resident,” the Times explains. He assumed–wrongly, as it turned out–that his parents had completed his citizenship paperwork. He enlisted in the Army in 1975 and “said he was given what he thought was a citizenship oath.” It wasn’t. “Several federal background checks” turned up nothing amiss with his immigration status. But when he decided to take a retirement cruise, “he could not find any trace of the naturalization papers he needed to get a passport.” He filed for citizenship and was denied, even though it was his right because he served in the military during the Vietnam Era (which is legally defined as having ended in May 1975). A spokesman for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services put out a statement apologizing “for handling Mr. Hernandez’s application as a regular naturalization case rather than a military one.”
Hernandez’s case “represents a broken immigration system,” his lawyer, Elizabeth Ricci, tells the Times. No doubt about that. But it represents something else, too: a broken voting system. According to the Times, Hernandez cast improper votes in “every major election” since 1976. That’s at least 10 of them, twice as many if it includes midterms. Noncitizens, including legal resident aliens, are forbidden to vote in every state. States that have sought to incorporate verification of citizenship into the voter-registration process have encountered obstacles from the Obama administration and denunciations from the New York Times.
Of course, even though they reported on this case, that doesn’t mean that the New York Times now understands why voter ID is important. These are liberals, remember?