Farook Family Lawyer Compares Posting Allegiance to ISIS to Viewing Britney Spears Post

Attorney David Chesley, who represents the Farook family, but not the dead jihadist Syed Rizem Farook, as he was quick to point out at a Los Angeles news conference today, has said some bizarre things about this case, all the while claiming to be “objective.”

From the Daily Mail:

To illustrate his point, Chesley made a bizarre reference to the Sandy Hook massacre, suggesting it didn’t take place as described in the official narrative.

‘There have been suggestions that it may be something that was related to their work, that somehow he was a disgruntled employee,’ he said. 

‘But it doesn’t seem plausible to us that this petite woman [Malik] would be involved in this sort of hyper-caricatured, Bonnie and Clyde crazy scenario.

‘There were a lot of questions drawn with Sandy Hook and whether or not that was a real incident or not.

‘But I mean obviously these things were found there, how they got there we don’t know.’

The Sandy Hook shootings occurred in December 2012, when gunman Adam Lanza, 20, shot his way into the front entrance of the school in Newtown, Connecticut, which was locked at the time, and killed 20 children and six teachers, then shot himself to death.

When Chesley was asked if he doubted the events of Sandy Hook, he said: ‘There has been a lot speculation about it is all I would say.

Tashfeen was a “typical housewife,” who chose not to drive voluntarily, a “very private person,” who wore a full burqa and spoke broken English. Her brothers-in-law never saw her face

Syed “liked to go in his garage and work on things.”

All Muslim are condemning this act says Chesley. You mean like CAIR?

“they had interests that matched up”

 

The Teri O'Brien Show

book