At the age of 22 Barack Obama had a strong ‘sexual warmth’ that overwhelmed his girlfriend at the time, according to a new book that identifies her for the first time.
Vivid diaries written by Austrailian exchange student Genevieve Cook reveal she was driven wild.
She said that on Sundays the future U.S. President loved to lounge around bare chested in a white and blue sarong whilst doing the newspaper crossword.
In a controversial claim she also recounted how he was deeply confused about his racial identity and ‘felt like an imposter because he was so white’. She also said that he didn’t “have a black bone in his body.”
In the end Cook said that Obama, who was raised in Hawaii by his white mother, decided that he needed to ‘go black’ because it was best for him.
Guy was 22 and wearing a sarong. It appears that he wasn’t just confused about his racial identity.
Have you ever checked out Obama as he deplanes AF1…he rides an invisible pony down the stairs….bouncing the tiny reins in his delicate hands
Lets revisit that statement Young Barack Obama had great ‘sexual warmth’ but…’didn’t have a black bone in his body’
Is that a polite way of saying that his “bone” was dimensionally challenged?
I venture to say that here wasn’t a black bone in HER body, either. But maybe HE actually DID have a black bone in his body. Reggie Love, pick up the white phone please!!!
Or maybe the “bone” was white? Paging Larry Sinclair!!!
I know you’ve all heard about Big Guy’s other composite girlfriend by now: Julia.
There are a lot of jokes flying around about composite GF’s like this one: “What’s the difference between a composite girlfriend and a pit bull? a pit bull is delicious.”
Van Jones quipped thusly on MSNBC not long ago, “I think if President Obama came out as gay he wouldn’t — President Obama is not going to lose the black vote no matter what he does,” in response to a question from host Alex Wagner about a potential loss of support among black voters if Obama came out in favor of same sex marriage. Was he testing the waters to gauge the response?
Could this explain as to why all the girlfriend’s stories are coming out this week, as opposed to all other weeks, The lawsuit Against Larry Sinclair was dismissed after the complainant failed to show Sinclair had published any knowingly false statementsg thus lending credibility to Larry Sinclair’s story: that he had homosexual relations with Obama. Obama’s handlers may be trying to get out in front of future revelations in time for Election Day confirming his rumored bisexuality, and that’s usually the kiss of death for a politician.
Barack also revealed his latest composite girlfriend — “Julia.” She’s worse than the old New York girlfriend. She seems to require massive government intervention at every significant stage of her life, from 3 to 67 years of age (they purposefully left out age 72, where she gets recycled intro Soylent Green after her Logan’s Run) She doesn’t seem to be able to accomplish anything without organizing her life around some form of Obama assistance every step of the way, from his “Head Start” program at the age of three through to his Social Security benefits at the age of 67. Everything good in her life she owes to his and Uncle Sugars beneficence. As Mark Steyn so aptly put it: “When she writes her memoir, it will be thanks to a subvention from the Federal Publishing Assistance Program for Chronically Dependent Women but you’ll love it: Sweet Dreams from My Sugar Daddy. She’s what the lawyers would call “non composite mentis.” She’s not competent to do a single thing for herself — and, from Barack’s point of view, that’s exactly what he’s looking for in a woman, if only for a one-night stand on a Tuesday in early November”.
Then there’s “Elizabeth,” a 62-year-old Democratic Senate candidate from Massachusetts. Like Barack’s white girlfriend, she couldn’t be black. She would if she could, but she couldn’t. But she could be a composite — a white woman and an Indian woman, composited and compressed! Indian insofar as checking the “Are you Native American?” box on the requisite form, which Elizabeth Warren did for much of her adult life. She says that she is part Cherokee and part Delaware. 1/32 to be exact!!!
Under the Third Reich’s Nuremberg Laws, Ms. Warren would have been classified as Aryan and Mr. Zimmerman as non-Aryan. Now it’s the other way round. Now that’s how liberals mark Progress!”
Composite, make believe woman for a composite, make believe President.
May I offer this edited introduction for any future revision to Obamas apocryphal autobiographical tome:
Genevulvia was lovely with her one breast larger than the other. But her long leg and short leg were slightly offputting. However the glasses she did and did not wear went perfectly with her blond, brown, short, long, red hair. And her beautiful lips could barely conceal her under/overbite and her perfect, slightly, crooked teeth.
She was definitely a thing or two of beauty to the imaginative, twice-smitten, young Indo-Hawaiian who could switch hit for either team. Indeed it was impossible not to lose oneself gazing into her dark brown, green, hazel, blue eyes and say with the most heartfelt of words, “I shall never forget y’all.”
Alas, how could such a romantic menage-a-twaddle that felt so right, go sarong?
I think that Moochelle is gonna need another multi million vacation and a whole new designer wardrobe after reading this stuff…and this is about a white chick, too
Hide the golf clubs or she’ll do an Elin Nordegren on the president
Julia was the “heroine” in Orwell’s 1984. Eventually she gave up her independent streak and returned to the protection of “Big Brother” The current Marxist administration is hiding NOTHING about their plans for AmeriKa.
Must we point out to the functional illiterates in the Obama Administration that 1984 was a critique of socialism, NOT an instruction manual.
1984 is an unbelievably powerful book. Because it accurately portrays the endpoint of totalitarianism. Where the Communists want to go. Where liberals want to go.
In “1984” we see what human nature is, and we see why the founding fathers (who could have never foreseen that work) worked towards the end they did, because even though they couldn’t see the end of that road, they knew it went somewhere black.
When I read “1984”, I invariably think of this passage from Churchill’s speech:
Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this Island or lose the war. If we can stand up to him, all Europe may be free and the life of the world may move forward into broad, sunlit uplands. But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.
From “1984”: “…There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.”
Liberals cannot believe that humans, even without so called “root causes” to justify behavior, have this in them. They still believe there are ways to stamp out these characteristics of human nature.
Conservatives, and the founding fathers, understood that evil just exists, and we need to account for it. It is why the Constitution was constructed the way it is.
Where are Julia’s parents?
Where is Julia’s father?
Where is Julia’s husband?
Nowhere. They are irrelevant. Uncle Sucker will take care of her without those oppressively patriarchal entities.
Come. Come and see!
See Julia take.
Take, Julia, Take!
“”At 31 years old, Under President Obama, Julia decided to have a child.” Could this be more Obamunist cover for Obama’s pending bisexual outing? The welfare state subject Julia is deflowered by the feudal entitlement lord exercising his Droit du seigneur?
If so, why didn’t Julia name her son “Trayvon instead of Zachary”? Maybe they should reconsider the wording of that?
I would just like to point out that Obama’s vision for “Julia” is the same vision Democrats have had over decades for “Tanisha”. Look how well it’s worked out for her.
So in conclusion, let me just say, Barack Hussein Obmama, Umm Ummmm Ummmmm!!!!!!