Because, as every American knows, if there’s one thing this country needs is more Syrian Muslims from jihadist hotbeds.
From Conservative Review:
Get ready for a surge of refugees from Syria, America.
Even with Obama’s alacritous commitment to bring in (only Muslim) Syrian refugees, the process began as a trickle thanks to existing protocol that established a protracted process for processing refugee applications. While only 100-250 refugees were admitted per month for the first 6 months of fiscal year 2016, that number has increased exponentially since April. Over 1,000 refugees were admitted in May and 950 have been admitted in just the first 8 days of June, according to the database of the Refugee Processing Center. Thus, although only 3,755 refugees have been admitted this fiscal year, Obama is well on his way to meeting his goal of 10,000 Syrians, given that they are now being admitted at a clip of over 100 per day.
As we noted in April, the Administration has set up a “resettlement surge center” in Amman, Jordan to process the refugee applications expeditiously. While the American people were promised a vetting process of 18-24 months per refugee, this new “surge” agenda has condensed the process to just three months. Now that this center has been operating for several months, Obama has a ready-made refugee mill that can churn out thousands of applications per month. (emphasis mine)
The Center for Immigration Studies posted an analysis of the expedited process and draws attention to comments from Simon Henshaw, principal deputy assistant secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, confirming that 12,000 applicants were interviewed between February and April in Amman, Jordan:
So the fact that 225 Syrian refugees were admitted into the United States in a new single-day record for Syrian refugee approvals is beside the point. What is of importance here is that 12,000 were interviewed in such a short time driven by the urgency to meet the September deadline. Of those, 4,700 have been approved, according to U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Johnson, and an additional 7,900 are awaiting final approval. How many come in a day or a week is more likely related to logistics (plane tickets, welcoming committees, available housing, etc.) and final screening.
As the State Department’s Henshaw stated in his oral presentation: “We have enough in perspective to bring them [10,000] in, 2,000 were brought already. We are on track.”
On track for what? Making sure that we have more Omar Mateen’s and Djokar Tsarnaevs in this country? Apparently America’s biggest problem is a shortage of Muslims from Syria that the government admits it cannot properly screen. Does that sound ridiculous to you? Of course it does, because it is.,
Then there is the enormous financial cost to taking in poor, semi-literate people who are unemployable, but fortunately, are eligible for government assistance.
Besides the risk of terrorist attacks in the U.S., there is also a huge financial cost to the U.S.
Senator Jeff Sessions for one, has chastised U.S. representatives for their response to President Obama’s refugee plan. As reported by Breitbart News, admitting 10,000 refugees into the United States “presents a net lifetime cost to taxpayers of $6.5 billion, meaning that under the current plan to admit 85,000 refugees this fiscal year, taxpayers will be on the hook for $55 billion,” he said.
Moreover, Americans would be wise to take heed of what has happened to citizens in Europe. Europeans have suffered intense economic, social, and criminal consequences (theft, murder, rape, and other violence), for the refugee policies and the invasion of these migrants in European countries.
The LAST THING that the United States need is more unvetted Muslims from jihadist hotbeds. Their resettlement in this country endangers our national security and puts Americans at risk.It costs us millions in government assistance. So why in the world are we doing it? Who benefits? The democrat party of course, and its mascot groups. Barack Obama’s “hope and change” is code for his “remaking” America, changing the country by changing its demographics, importing the 3rd world here as payback for this wicked nation’s centuries of “racism” and “imperialism.”
Let me say it again: If you voted for this repellant anti-American jerk, either in 2008 or 2016, that is what you voted for. Congratulation, and thanks a lot!
Is it as frustrating to you as it is to me that this reality is blatantly obvious, and has been for years, when so many of our fellow citizens seem so oblivious about the deliberate damage our first affirmative-action assisted Marxist occupant of the Oval Office has done to our country? Please let me know in the comments below.