Preview of Coming Attractions for the U.S.? Why Work?

I know it seems like a century ago, but remember when that evil Republican plutocrat Mitt Romney made his heinous, caught-on-tape remarks about the “47%,” which were later shared with the world by the hillbilly mutant grandson of the King of the Useful Idiots, James Carter IV? Some consider it poetic justice that Romney would be taken down by a Carter spawn, since Mitt like to criticize our 39th president on the campaign trail. I kept thinking it was a bit ironic that a 35 year-old man who had not been able to hold a job suddenly may have found gainful employment as a result of stating the obvious; that is,  that there are takers v. makers.

What Mitt Romney said was true, although I admit it was very in artfully stated because his statement allowed the Left to demagogue and distort it by conflating Social Security recipients and veterans with the real takers, people like this pair in the U.K. From The Sun:

A SKIVING couple told last night how they claim £17,680 a year in benefits — and don’t even bother looking for work because it would leave them worse off.
Danny Creamer, 21, and Gina Allan, 18, spend each day watching their 47in flatscreen TV and smoking 40 cigarettes between them in their comfy two-bedroom flat.
It is all funded by the taxpayer, yet the couple say they deserve sympathy because they are “trapped”.

It is all funded by the taxpayer, yet the couple say they deserve sympathy because they are “trapped”.

They even claim they are entitled to their generous handouts because their hard-working parents have been paying tax for years.

The couple, who have a four-month-old daughter Tullulah-Rose, say they can’t go out to work as they could not survive on less than their £1,473-a-month benefits.

The pair left school with no qualifications, and say there is no point looking for jobs because they will never be able to earn as much as they get in handouts.

Gina admits: “We could easily get a job but why would we want to work — we would be worse off.”

Danny’s father, 46, even offered him a job with his bowling alley servicing company — but could not pay him enough.

Danny’s mum, 45, works as a carer, while Gina’s mum, 46, is a teacher and her dad, 53, is a manager with a security company.

Yet their parents’ work ethic has not rubbed off on Danny and Gina. Instead, they claim they are entitled to benefits because of their parents’ tax contributions — and even complain they should be given MORE.

Gina, flaunting fake tan and perfectly manicured nails, said: “I don’t see that we’re living off the taxpayers, we’re entitled to the money our parents paid all their lives.

OK, then. Don’t you worry about this sort of entitlement mentality appearing in this country, and even if it does, I’m sure that there’s plenty of cash in Obama’s stash to provide for everyone who wants to spend their lives sitting in their little government-provided hovels, smoking and watching their flat screen TVs. Like these women. Remember them?


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

The Teri O'Brien Show

%d bloggers like this: