Discriminatory? No, protecting the vote of everyone who votes legally and keeping it from being cancelled out by a illegal voter. Duh.
From the WaPo:
A federal judge Monday upheld North Carolina’s controversial new voting law, dealing a blow to critics who said the state’s rules will discourage minorities from casting ballots during this fall’s presidential election.
The voting law, passed by North Carolina’s legislature in 2013, is among the strictest in the country. It reduces the number of days of early voting, prohibits people from registering and voting on the same day, stops ballots cast in the wrong precinct from being counted, ends the practice of preregistering teenagers before they turned 18 and requires a photo ID to vote.
Republican legislators say they added the restrictions to combat voter fraud and to preserve the integrity of the voting system.
In his 485-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder wrote that “North Carolina has provided legitimate state interests for its voter ID requirement and electoral system that provides registration all year long up to twenty-five days before an election, absentee voting for up to sixty days before an election, ten days of early voting at extended hours convenient for workers that includes one Sunday and two Saturdays, and Election Day voting.”
The very fact that this law is characterized as “controversial” by anyone shows how successful the Left has been at selling the insane idea that requiring a person to produce a photo ID to vote constitutes invidious discrimination. The only people it discriminates against are those trying to vote illegally and the politicians who use them.