“Flexible” Obama Explains Russian Email Hacking

You can’t make this stuff up. In an NBC News Interview, Obama parrots DNC line about Russians hacking the party’s email.

Watch our Dear Reader explain (~:56) that we do know that the Russians are into hacking our systems, not just government systems, but private systems: 

So the theory is that Putin and the Russians want to help Donald Trump win the election by exposing the fact that the Democrat National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign were in cahoots to freeze out Bernie Sanders. Crazy Bernie never had a chance. The fix was in,  even though disgraced former Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz swore up and down for months that the she and the party didn’t have their thumbs on the scale.

In fairness, I feel compelled to ask the backward children and delusional fossils who are supporting Bernie and even donated to him, once he said “I’m tired of hearing about your damn email,” wasn’t it obvious that he wasn’t serious about winning? Shouldn’t you be holding him responsible for stringing you along? Shouldn’t you be suing him for accepting those $27 contributions that were obtained through fraud?

As far as the Russians favoring Trump, it is only because of the very helpful media, ignoring, even though the story has appeared in the Liberal Death Star aka The New York Times, the Clintons’ ties to Russia, specifically through Uranian One. From The New York Times:

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

And wasn’t it Barack Obama who wanted Vladimir Putin to understand that he would have more “flexibility” after his re-election? Sure it was.

More interesting, though, are Obama’s comments about the Russians hacking into private email systems. You mean that can happen?

18 comments

  1. I’m more than a little amused watching all the pro-Hillary establishment Democrats getting their panties all wadded up while trying to pin the fact that the DNC’s servers got hacked on “the Russians”. I know that this flailing attempt at damage control is just that but they seem to be overlooking the bigger issue. If the DNC servers got hacked by a hostile foreign power like Russia then it stands to reason that Hillary’s home-brew server got hacked as well. They’re not doing themselves any favors by trying to pin this on the Russians. They’re only making themselves look even more incompetent.

    • Yes, Robert, it’s ridiculous and insulting that the DNC and Hillary think they can change the subject from their conspiracy to defraud Bernie’s supporters by pretending to be neutral in the contest between Sen. Sanders & Hillary. It insults our intelligence because they clearly must think that we are too stupid to connect the dots between their saying Russia can hack email server and Hillary’s outlaw server.

  2. Brad, the first person I saw say that “experts” claimed that the Russians were hacking the DNC was Hillary’s pathetic spokesperson Robby Mook, who also during the same interview–I think it was the same one–responded to a question about polls tightening by saying “all presidential elections are close.” Spoken like a real low information millennial moron.1956? 1964? 1984? PULEEZE Pinhead! But I digress–he puts that out there, and next thing you know, by pure coincidence I’m sure, Obama picks up the same talking point. And, as Michael points out, and as I’m sure all of you have noticed, the DNC set forth that narrative that the media would follow; specifically, who is hacking the democrats to try to be mean to Hillary? NOT the real news,which is 1)the fact that the DNC and Hillary conspired to screw Bernie Sanders and his supporters and 2)the substance of what’s in those emails, which contain offensive language. If Republican email had that kind of stuff in them, THAT would be the lead story 24/7 until the presidential election.

  3. There’s that, I guess, Chris.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

The Teri O'Brien Show

book
%d bloggers like this: