SMOKING GUN: “We Can’t Take That Risk,” Says Corrupt DOJ Official Hired by Mueller Referring to Trump Presidency

Mueller and his Deep State attempted coup exposed for what we have known that is has always been: a tainted, partisan witch hunt.

MuellerThey’re pretty clear that these are people who’ve a strong preference but the understanding that

So, it turns out that there was “collusion” to interfere with the 2016 presidential election, but i had nothing to do with Russia, and no Russians were involved. Rather, it was the FBI and the Department of Justice using the crushing power of federal law enforcement to try to destroy the presidential candidacy of Donald J. Trump.

Mueller and his Deep State attempted coup is exposed for the whole world to see in series of text messages sent in 2015 and 2016 exchanged by disgraced FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and his adulterous lover FBI lawyer Lisa Page.

From The Daily Caller:

Two FBI officials who worked on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation exchanged text messages last year in which they appear to have discussed ways to prevent Donald Trump from being elected president.

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok wrote in a cryptic text message to Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer and his mistress.

“It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok wrote in the text, dated Aug. 15, 2016.

Andy is likely Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe.

Or perhaps it is unethical sleazy prosecutor Andrew Weismann.

There’s more: Also from The Daily Caller:

Strzok and Page’s exchanges show a deep disdain for Trump and admiration for Clinton. In a text sent on Oct. 20, 2016, Strzok called the Republican a “f*cking idiot.”

In on Aug. 6 text, Strzok responded to an article shared by Page by replying, “F Trump.”

The pair exchanged another cryptic text message that same day.

“Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace,”Page wrote. 

“I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps,” Strzok replied.(emphasis mine)

Like many of the exchanges, the full context of the message is not entirely clear.

Strzok also offered praise for Clinton while suggesting that he planned to vote for her.

In a March 2, 2016 text Strzok said he would likely vote for Clinton. In another exchange he wrote that if Trump won the Republican primary, Clinton would likely win the presidency.

“God Hillary should win 100,000,000 – 0,” he told Page.

Can anyone say “Fruit of Poisonous Tree?”

These two adulterous texters knew that they were doing something wrong as evidenced by Ms. Page’s text, showing concern about their disgusting and gossipy little texts being traced. From CBS News:

“So look, you say we can text on that phone when we talk about Hillary because it cant be traced,” she wrote.

Peter Strzok’s finger prints are all over this disgraceful charade, which is not a surprise given his role in the investingation. From CBS News:

During the campaign, Strzok led the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server while she was secretary of state. The texts sent between Page and Strzok are dated between August 2015 and December 2016, the duration of the campaign. They raise concerns about Strzok’s impartiality and will likely prompt more questions about the investigation into Clinton’s server.

Consider the following:

Peter Strzok interviewed both Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, two of the three members of Hillary Clinton’s coven. Despite their apparently providing “misleading responses” (yes, that’s The Daily Caller’s charitable way of saying that they lied to the FBI), they were not charged. Contrast the treatment of Michael Flynn, also interviewed by Strzok, in a surprise visit, which conveniently meant that the general did not have counsel present. It has also been reported that he participated in the interview of Hillary Clinton the weekend before Comey’s infamous press conference, although this fact is unconfirmed.

It’s clear that Barack Obama’s weaponizing of various federal agencies, including the FBI, the IRS, and the Department of (In)Justice. Recall that this probe began with James Comey admitting that he leaked information with the specific goal of having a Special Counsel appointed. Conveniently, that appointment went to his BFF Robert Mueller.

So many questions occur:

  • Was Strzok’s modifying James Comey’s statement about Hillary’s illegal outlaw server scheme, changing “gross negligence,” the words from the applicable statute, to “extreme carelessness” part of that insurance policy?
  • Why didn’t “Mr. Integrity” Robert Mueller tell the American people about this Strzok’s guy’s breathtaking bias and dishonesty back in July, rather than just quietly taking him off the team?
  • The American Bar Association says that there are over 50,000 lawyers in D.C. Why does Mueller’s team consist almost entirely of partisan democrats who have either donated to Obama and/or Hillary Clinton or even represented her or the Clinton Foundation?
  • Given these facts, are you really comfortable with the approximately $6.7 million Mueller’s investigation has cost in the first 4.5 months in office?
  • Why is current FBI director Christopher Wray refusing to tell Congress, and by extension, the American people, the exact role that Peter Strzok had in the Clinton and Trump investigations?
  • And most important, why do Peter Strzok and Lisa Page still have a taxpayer-funded jobs?

Please let me know in the comments below whether you think that every single American should be concerned about the very disturbing set of facts that have emerged about this ridiculous, partisan and costly investigation.

The Teri O'Brien Show

book