Ed Schulz Asks “Are Conservatives The New Confederates?”

Of course in fairness to Crazy Ed, who recently returned to weekdays on the 24/7 televised nuthouse, he got the idea from Jesse Jackson.

You know how Google has that Keyword Tool that you can use to generate good keywords for your website advertising? Jesse Jackson is like a Crazy Talk Phrase Tool that you can use when you’re looking a really non-sensical collection of syllables like “a jury of Trayvon’s peers,” even though George Zimmerman was the guy on trial, or as illustrated in this clip from today’s “Ed Show,” calling the Tea Party the “Fort Sumter Party.” Great. Now someone is going to have to explain to liberals what “Fort Sumter” is.

Crazy Talk Phrase Tool, and also just a tool.

How “Far” We’ve Come: From Rosa Parks to Oprah and From Emmett Till to Trayvon Martin

Later today, our Sham WOW (Walks on Water) current occupant of the Oval Office will continue his endless summer of surfing on the mother of all waves of white guilt to try to distract everyone from the retched economy and the disastrous consequences of his “lead from behind” policies in the Middle East, including an imminent military strike on Syria. Since I know that everyone agrees with Eric Holder. We don’t talk enough about race in this country, so let’s take the occasion of this anniversary to broach a subject that is almost never mentioned.

As I watch all the TV talking heads babbling on about the 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “March on Washington,” something has been bothering me, but I couldn’t figure out exactly what that was, other than my usual irritation at the vapid commentary that these supposedly knowledgeable, pompous windbags pump out non-stop. Now I realize why these commemorations ring not only hollow, but are quite annoying.

It is because race baiters from Barack Obama and Eric Holder to Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and all the thousands of lower-tier practitioners of this despicable, destructive trade, pay lip service to Dr. King’s call to judge people by the content of their character, not  the color of their skin, when in fact what they really mean is that only white people need to heed that call because white people are apparently inherently and forever guilty of racism. There is no other explanation for what so many of these people say and do. Racism on the part of blacks must be ignored, or if noted, justified by some historical actions that happened decades or even centuries ago. Blacks vote for black candidates specifically because they are black, proudly so, and no one dares suggest that it’s racist for them to do so. If 96 percent of white people had voted for John McCain in 2008, we would still be hearing the Lame Stream Media “experts” squealing like scalded hogs about the disgrace that is “racist” Amerika. In fact, though 96% of black voters cast their ballots for Sen. Barack Obama and 43% of whites did so. Nothing to see here. Michelle Obama writes a semi-literate college thesis in which she proclaims

“Earlier in my college career, there was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the Black community I was somehow obligated to this community and would utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost. My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my “Blackness” than ever before. I have found that at Princeton no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my White professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don’t belong. Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with Whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be Black first and a student second.These experiences have made it apparent to me that the path I have chosen to follow by attending Princeton will likely lead to my further integration and/or assimilation into a White cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant. This realization has presently, made my goals to actively utilize my resources to benefit the Black community more desirable.”

Yeah, Mooch, I hear you. Affirmative action admission will do that to you, you know (as you would say), make you feel like a visitor. Clearly, if this thesis is the sort of work that you were capable of producing, you didn’t belong at an elite college. Leaving the sub-standard level of her writing and scholarship aside, to celebrate today’s big anniversary, let’s do a little thought experiment. What if Cindy McCain or Anne Romney had written a college thesis in which she “made my goals to actively utilize my resources to benefit the White community more desirable”? Exactly. Barack Obama attends a church led by a screeching racist that proudly touts its “Black Value System” for 20 years, and no one bats an eye. Try a similar thought experiment. Could any white person be elected to even a local office if it were learned that he attended a church that had a “White Value System?” And of course, we recently learned, that unlike all 43 presidents before him, Barack Obama is above criticism, because any criticism of anything he does, even the ridiculous antics of a rodeo clown, is inherently “racist.”

Recently, we have endured disgusting comparisons of the racist murder of Emmett Till in 1955 with the justifiable killing of drug using, burglar and would-be MMA fighter Trayvon Martin. The suggestion that there is moral equivalency between these two cases is breathtaking in its stupidity, and yet, allegedly intelligent people have been making it incessantly for the last several weeks, including the air-headed Oprah Winfrey. She is the walking embodiment of the greatness of America, a country in which a woman incapable of reasoning her way out of a paper bag can amass a fortune larger than the combined wealth of several nations.

In another recent cringe-inducing incident, the Oprah tried to portray herself as the new Rosa Parks because she was allegedly treated rudely in a fancy European boutique while trying to purchase a $38,000 purse. Who better to lecture us about racism in America?

So, today we will have the bizarre spectacle of people like the Oprah and Barack Obama, who but for their race would not be where they are, pretending to celebrate a speech that implored everyone to work for a color-blind society, which happens to be their worst nightmare.

Larry Elder Dishes About the Oprah, Shares Surprising Stuff About Jackson, Sharpton & Farrakhan-The Teri O’Brien Show, 8-18-13

Listen here.

talk radio, The Teri O'Brien Show

Larry Elder – LarryElder.com – Home of the Larry Elder Show and the Elderados – The Sage From South Central

The Real Oprah Emerges RaceBaiter: Four Blacks Kill Young Couple in Cruelest Way – Every Bit As Cruel As Emmett Till | Maggie’s Notebook (Can anyone tell me why anyone ever saw any redeeming value in the Oprah and her silly shows?)

Robert Reich (Why the Anger?) (Seriously? This piece is an unintentionally hilarious view inside the cranium of the East-Coast-Brain-Rot afflicted, disconnected elites who need to buy a vowel)

Stand up for Trayvon Martin by amending ‘stand your ground’ – The Washington Post (Even though “Stand Your Ground” laws had ZERO to do with the sad incident that resulted in the death of dope-smoking thug Trayvon Martin)

NSA broke privacy rules thousands of times per year, audit finds – The Washington Post

For Obama, 50 years after historic march, economic equality the path to racial justice – The Washington Post

Court: Ability to police U.S. spying program limited – The Washington Post

Opinion: Why are IRS employees getting big bonuses? – Rep. Mark Meadows – POLITICO.com (Why do we have to give six-figure incentives to people who are not only very well compensated, but also often incompetent? This piece is a must-read, but I warn you, it will enrage you when you learn what these federal parasites are receiving from us. I hope that Lois Lerner is enjoying her paid summer vacation, which appears to have no end date. She could at least send us a postcard, no?)

Protected: Subscribers Only: Enhanced Show Notes, The Teri O’Brien Show, 8-18-13 with Special Guest Larry Elder

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Zimmerman Verdict Revives “Grievance Guru” Industry

By Guest Contributor, Taleeb Starkes, Author of “The Un-Civil War: BLACKS vs NI**ERS” 

As expected, George Zimmerman’s acquittal is being exploited by the usual “Grievance Gurus” to forward personal agendas. In buzzard-like fashion, they continue to figuratively rip from Trayvon Martin’s carcass to satisfy their insatiable, race-fueled appetite, while ostracizing free-thinking BLACKS who avoid the feeding frenzy. In fact, the President of the NAACP’s Norfolk, Virginia chapter is facing resignation calls for posting (on Facebook) an independent thought about Trayvon that differed from the NAACP franchise’s official position. He observed, “As I look at this George Zimmerman case… I wonder why is it that we are always willing to say someone who clearly had a shaky past, was the victim. Are we blinded about why Trayvon was at his dad’s house in the first place, and why he wasn’t at home at the time he was shot? Please think logically and not racially…” Undoubtedly, the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Complaining People) will persecute him for the treasonous act of placing logic over race. Moreover, he jeopardized their revenue stream, which is based on victimology not responsibility; therefore… off with his head!

Even in Booker T. Washington’s day, when claims of institutional racism had legitimacy, the “Grievance Gurus” exploitative mission was a reality. Washington recognized, “There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs. There is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don’t want the patient to get well.” Sadly, in 2013, as evidenced by the abundance of race-peddling (post Zimmerman verdict), this “certain class of race-problem solvers” are still channeling the long-gone era of institutionalized racism to keep their jobs.

One unintended consequence of this lawful acquittal is that the Grievance Gurus found another platform to maintain their relevancy… the Stand Your Ground Law. Despite the fact that this law has existed for years without issue, and was mostly invoked by Black Floridians (nearly double the rate of their 16% Florida population), this was simply another opportunity for the Gurus to extend their livelihoods. The Daily Caller noted, “Approximately one third of Florida “Stand Your Ground” claims in fatal cases have been made by black defendants, and they have used the defense successfully 55 percent of the time, at the same rate as the population at large and at a higher rate than white defendants.” Regardless, the Grievance Gurus will characteristically dismiss any statistic that challenges their race-based narrative as racist.

The Chief Grievance Guru, Al Sharpton, scheduled “Justice for Trayvon” rallies outside Federal buildings across the country. Speaking in NYC, he told the vengeful mob attendees that Stand Your Ground invites racial profiling, and even compared its impact to slavery and segregation. In the nation’s capital, comedian/activist Dick Gregory instructed the hoodie brigade to boycott Florida’s tourism and agricultural industries (specifically Disney and Orange producers) to help eliminate the Stand Your Ground Laws. Another Chief Grievance Guru, Jesse Jackson, told CNN, “No doubt, the inclination is to boycott Florida, stop conventions, to isolate Florida as a kind of apartheid state.”

Of course, Attorney General Holder couldn’t avoid the feeding frenzy. However, his angle is to disarm law-abiding citizens while empowering criminals. He stated, “Separate and apart from the case that has drawn the nation’s attention, it’s time to question laws that senselessly expand the concept of self-defense and sow dangerous conflict in our neighborhoods.” Surely, I’m not the only citizen who believes that the Bureau of Justice statistics should be a required read for the head of the Justice department.

As expected, Holder’s boss (Obama) added fuel to this manufactured inferno. He chimed, “If we’re sending a message as a society in our communities that someone who is armed potentially has the right to use those firearms, even if there’s a way for them to exit from a situation, is that really going to be contributing to the kind of peace and security and order that we’d like to see?” Ironically, this anti-gun stance comes from a man who has heavily armed, James Bond-like agents providing twenty-four hour security detail. Go figure.

Just to stay employed, Grievance Gurus will even cut off their noses to spite their faces. Well, not their own noses…they would never harm themselves. I’m talking about the noses of their gullible followers. The Grievance Gurus aren’t concerned that their promoted boycotts would ultimately hurt the very people they claim to serve. As preached in their victimology gospel, which my controversial book “The Un-Civil War: BLACKS vs NI**ERS” details, poverty is a main catalyst for the disproportionate amount of Black crime and anti-social behavior; yet, they’re encouraging a boycott of Florida State that will exacerbate those conditions.

Don’t be fooled by the Grievance Gurus’ angry facade that’s currently being marketed post Zimmerman trial, the verdict was actually a victory for them. Even though Jorge George Zimmerman was deceitfully categorized as “White Hispanic,” he already had enough exploitable Whiteness to prolong their careers.

IJreview.com reported that in the 503 days between the Trayvon shooting and Zimmerman verdict, 10,865 Blacks were murdered by other Blacks. Even so, there were no hoodie marches, boycotts, or calls to repeal Stand Your Ground in any state because thousands of Black-on-Black homicides aren’t as profitable as one White-on-Black homicide. Moreover, this harrowing statistic remains unmentioned by the Grievance Gurus because the shooters were Black. Inconvenient truths, such as these, reflect the race-based hypocrisy that’s practiced in the Black community; even a Kermit Gosnell is preferable to a George Zimmerman.

Black-on-Black genocide is so common that Pittsburgh’s Black press openly celebrated when June yielded no Black homicides. The New Pittsburgh Courier rejoiced, “The past few weeks have been loaded with news, with the most popular being the Supreme Court decisions on Affirmative Action, Voting Rights and Gay Marriages. But there was an even bigger news story that occurred that most of the media missed. It was huge. No Black homicides in the month of June. Yes you read it right. No Black homicides in the entire month of June. Zero.”

Predictably, the Grievance Gurus would say that this anomaly only occurred because Zimmerman was on a strict, court-imposed curfew during June, and couldn’t make his way to Pittsburgh to kill any Blacks.

Follow Taleeb on Twitter.

“Be the change that you want to see in the world.” – Ghandi

“If you can find a path with no obstacles, it probably doesn’t lead anywhere.”

Community Organizer in Chief in Full Alinsky Mode Disgraces His Office Again

The organizer dedicated to changing the life of a particular community must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act. The use of the adjective “controversial” to qualify the word “issue” is a meaningless redundancy. There can be no such thing as a “non-controversial” issue. When there is agreement there is no issue; issues only arise when there is disagreement or controversy. An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent; provide a channel into which the people can angrily pour their frustrations.

-Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals

As we discussed on yesterday’s edition of The Teri O’Brien Show, Barack Obama’s “surprise” visit to the White House press room last Friday was a disgusting politically-motivated stunt designed to manipulate one of his most important mascot groups, blacks, who are demanding additional persecution of an innocent man, George Zimmerman, even though everyone involved in the case, including the prosecutors, declared that the case had nothing to do with race, and even though Barack Obama himself said that the trial was conducted fairly. It is nauseating to watch this pathetic, narcissistic empty suit, who has had everything handed to him his entire life because of his black skin privilege, and who has done almost nothing to try to solve the problems in the black community, pander to worst impulses in human nature; specifically, envy, resentment and racism.

Thinking that Barack Obama and Eric Holder, and their ideological dopplegangers, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, want racism to end is like thinking that the R. Randall Rollins, chairman of Rollins, Inc., the parent company of Orkin, wants insect infestations to magically disappear. That would be very bad for business, and the end of racism, or even a diminution in the endless conversation about racial discrimination would be very bad for Barack Obama, whose family business is race baiting. He surfed into the U.S. Senate on a wave of white guilt, then rode a tsunami of that same white guilt into the Oval Office. That’s why he wants to talk about little else. Certainly not the levels of unemployment in his stagnant economy, especially not in the African-American community.

Careful observers watching last Friday’s bizarre spectacle would be reasonable to ask what Barack Obama being followed in a department store or Eric Holder being stopped trying to catch a movie has to do with a criminal case in which one guy was using “ground and pound” MMA tactics to beat the crap out of another guy. Nothing, other than trying to connect this criminal case with the victimhood of blacks in racist Amerika, to “rub raw the resentments of the people of the community.”

How much better it would have been last Friday if Barack Obama had addressed the real problems in the black community, the illegitimacy rate, the school drop out rate, and the resulting disproportionate number of crimes committed by young black men. Instead, he said that they are “disproportionately involved in the criminal justice system.” Then, right after saying “It’s not to make excuses for that fact,” he proceeded to excuse it, as being part of “a historical context. We understand that some of the violence that takes place in poor black neighborhoods around the country is born out of a very violent past in this country, and that the poverty and dysfunction that we see in those communities can be traced to a very difficult history.”  Wrong. It can be traced to the factors I mentioned above; specifically, the destruction of the black family, featuring out-of-wedlock births, the federal government in the role of provider for the family, adolescent males growing up without the example and the guidance of a father in the home, poor performance in school, often resulting in semi-literacy and the inability to be a contributing member of society.

If Barack Obama wants to talk about “historical context” for the problems in the black community, he might want to start with (so-called) “Great Society” programs of the 1960′s. We have thrown trillions down this social welfare rathole, and the worst part isn’t all the money that we’ve wasted. It’s that we spent all that treasure to raze the black family, along with the potential of millions of human beings.

Obama Goes Full Alinsky To Hide His Many Failures, and Men on Strike: The Teri O’Brien Show, 7-21-13

At this point, is there a dime’s worth of difference between Barack Obama and Eric Holder on the one hand, and Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson on the other? If you have any doubt about that, and about why Barack Obama appeared to do more race hustling in the White House briefing room, perhaps the following will clear things up. From the Washington Post:

On Thursday, Obama informed his senior staff that he wanted to share his thoughts, leading to his appearance at the podium Friday during Carney’s scheduled daily briefing.

Civil rights leaders have been communicating with White House officials about the Zimmerman case, including a conference call Tuesday with senior adviser Valerie Jarrett. But officials said they did not press Obama to speak publicly about the case.

Sharpton said he discussed the issue with Jarrett over breakfast Friday.

Wait–Al Sharpton, Race Hustler Extraordinaire, he of Tawana Brawley and Freddy’s Fashion Mart Fame, was having breakfast with the One’s closest adviser last Friday. This after Sharpton had been agitating for months to intimidate Florida officials into prosecuting (persecuting) a man who exercised his right of self-defense. No one should be surprised that gutless weasel politicians were all too eager to comply.


The Saul Alinsky playbook is all about divide and conquer, “rub raw the sores of discontent,” and never let a crisis go to waste. It’s a long way from “hope and change,” which most of you knew was a steaming load of crap from the jump. Sadly, the clueless wet-behind-the-ears, the low information and the well-intentioned, but emotionally-driven, weren’t able to see through the beautiful B.S. in the 2008 and 2012 elections. Now Obama has returned to the well one more time to try to accomplish two objectives; specifically, (1) to distract the public, with the enabling legacy media, from the still stagnant economy, with its high unemployment and under-employment, the remaining questions about the murder of 4 Americans in Benghazi on 9/11/12, Eric Holder’s stonewalling about the bloody Fast and Furious operation, and the IRS targeting of Barack Obama’s political opponents with a goal to suppress votes in 2012, and (2) to stoke the fires of racial division to energize voters for 2014. We’ll deconstruct his repellent, race baiting speech from Friday.

Despite the unwillingness of all the “learned” commentators to mention it, one aspect of the tragic story of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman is the fact that Trayvon came from a broken home. To what extent can we hold the liberal social policies that have destroyed the black family complicit in the death of Trayvon Martin? And, sadly, it seems that many men are checking out when it comes to marriage. Why has Ward Cleaver turned into Homer Simpson, or as Dr. Helen Smith, author of Men on Strike: Why Men are Boycotting Marriage Fatherhood and the American Dream and Why it Matters, some schlub with a flowered diaper bag? Is the legal system turned completely and unfairly against men? We’ll ask Dr. Smith.

In another stunning development, as of last Thursday’s hearing in Rep. Darryl Issa’s House Oversight Committee,  the IRS scandal involving targeting of Tea Party groups has been laid at the door of the White House. The reaction from the Jurassic Media? More stories about cute animals, weather, and Rolling Stone

Tune in tomorrow for the rest of the story.