Our Caring Dear Leader Shows His Enormous Caring Again

First published at Clash Daily

Barack Hussein Obama, caring

If there’s one thing we know about Obama, it’s that he cares.

If there’s one thing we know about our Dear Reader, Barack Hussein Obama (Praise be his name), it’s that he cares about people, especially the little people, that 47% that that rich, selfish Mitt Romney dissed during that infamous appearance in front of a group of equally selfish, greedy, uncaring rich people. Everybody knows that if caring about the “middle class” were people, Barack Obama would be China. If caring were measured in grains of sand, Barack Obama’s caring would be more than all the grains of sand on all the beaches of a thousand planet Earths. Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) can cry all he wants. He could even persuade the Oprah to interview him, and he could cry on live TV during the interview in which he declares that, like Sen. Mark Kirk, he now understands that all that matters is “who you love and who loves you back.” Still, even after that, soccer mommies, American Idol groupies and all other similarly situated low-information observers would know that Barack cares more about them than Speaker Boehner does or anyone else ever has or ever will.

How else to explain his latest incredibly caring and magnanimous evidence of his tremendous caring, offering to give back 5% of the salary that we subjects pay him to rule us? It’s hard to believe, but this preternatural creature earns only $400,000 a year for the tremendously difficult work that he does just for us. It would be a bargain at twice that annual price to be led by one so brilliant, so wise, and, yes, so caring, and yet he’s going to give back!  Isn’t that what life is all about? What more can this man do for us? Once again, he is leading by example, Peasant.

Some naysaying bitter clingers, cynical as ever, have tried to sully Barack’s beautiful, selfless act by bringing up the following facts, which they foolishly believe will tarnish the public’s opinion of our beloved Dear Leader (Reader):

  • By giving back 5%, Barack Obama will be returning $20,000 to the Federal Treasury, or less than he spent flying Air Force One out to California for his most recent fundraiser. This amount won’t have any effect on his lifestyle because he lives in government housing, and he doesn’t pay for the gas in caravan of SUV’s that transport him and his family. Plus, he’s really rich. Sure, all that’s true, but he still cares about you, Peasant. Just because his lifestyle is not affected one iota by what you call a “symbolic and meaningless gimmick,” unlike this guy, Jeff Maryak, who has suffered a 27% pay cut as a result of the sequester, that doesn’t change how much it shows that he cares. Mr. Maryak, a Bronze Star winner has resorted to delivering pizzas at night after doing his 9-5, and he still can’t make ends meet, so he is seeking a military redeployment. I have no doubt, though, that Mr. Maryak felt so much better today when he learned of President Obama’s magnificent gesture.
  • Some point out that perhaps President Obama was not motivated to give back 5% of his pay by his love and caring for his people, but rather because of the drop in his approval rating, which may have resulted from the suspension of White House tours, something the little people and their children look forward to during their Spring Break vacations. When juxtaposed with the Obama family’s perpetual vacations, including the Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous style “sun and ski” combo recently enjoyed by the Obama daughters, some suggest that he needed to do something to remind the downtrodden how much he cares about them, more than he cares about anything else on this earth. Now he has. I hope that everyone is satisfied and can now move on. Oh yes, some people like those whiners over at Judicial Watch, who are going to insist on finding out how much the Obama princesses recent trip cost taxpayers, won’t, but the rest of us should feel our hearts swell just thinking about how much our wise ruler cares.
  • Finally, some have actually pointed out that Barack Obama did this to be “in solidarity” with “government workers,” and have suggested that this language sounds like something out of the old Soviet Union’s lexicon. They also note that, while he never fails to show concern for government employees who lose their jobs, always citing the horror of even one public school teacher being laid off, for example, he seems completely unconcerned about the jaw-dropping increase in the number of people in private sector who have become so discouraged in the Obama economy that they have completely stopped looking for work. These people have completely checked out, and like ghost workers they haunt our economy. The labor participation rate in 2008 was over 66 million, and it has dropped every year of Barack Obama’s presidency. Now it stands at 63.5 percent. It’s wrong to criticize Barack Obama for not mentioning people displaced from the private sector. He cares about these lost workers, too. We know he does because that’s one thing everybody knows about Barack Obama. That he cares. More than anyone.

Obama Daughters Enjoy Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous: Show Notes 3-31-13

Thanks to our guest, Professor Gary Wolfram of Hillsdale College, and congratulations to him on the terrific book, A Capitalist Manifesto.

NetGalley Catalog (link to Professor Wolfram’s book–don’t miss it!)

Exclusive: Judicial Watch Investigating Cost of Sasha, Malia Bahamas Trip

Sasha and Malia Obama ‘Learn What They Live’ | Jeannie-ology

Exclusive: Sasha, Malia Obama Vacation at Bahamas’ ‘Atlantis’ Resort

Chuck Grassley writing alternative Senate gun bill – John Bresnahan and Manu Raju – POLITICO.com

Obama uses executive power to move gun control agenda forward – The Hill (mark my words: these “studies” on the causes of gun violence will be used to justify more infringements on our rights)

The ‘40 Percent’ Myth – John Lott – National Review Online (This myth has been completely debunked, but that doesn’t stop Barack Obama and his PR flacks from repeating it. Shame on YOU. Barack Obama for using murdered children to try to promote your leftwing agenda.)

Business and labor strike deal on low-skilled worker program for immigration bill – The Washington Post

TSA fires 4 screeners, suspends dozens in wake of probe at Newark Liberty airport | NJ.com (Ironic-Newark Mayor Cory Booker asks on ABC’s “This Week,” What if TSA didn’t screen flyers?)

Records: Evan Ebel told prison guard she would ‘beg for her life’ – CNN.com (an alleged straw purchaser was arrested in the case of the murder of the Colorado prison chief, and she could get 16 years in prison. Wait …I thought we needed more laws against “straw purchasers.”)

WTF File: How Did We Get Into This Mess? Today on The Teri O’Brien Show-3-31-13

On this Easter Sunday, it’s essential that Americans count our many blessings. We have a lot of problems to solve, but we live in the greatest country on earth. Still, as our economy continues to limp along, Obamacare begins its steps of destruction, and our media is obsessed with so-called “same sex marriage,” it’s also appropriate to ask, how did we get here? How did we get into this mess? Certainly it is the result of Barack Obama’s ongoing project to “remake” (read “destroy”) the country we grew up in and replace it with a Euro-style socialist paradise. To completely answer the question, though, we need to take a step back. The very fact that someone like B. Hussein Obama could be elected President of the United States in the first place is nothing short of appalling, given his radical, anti-Constitution ideology, which he has embraced for 30 years and which was not exactly a secret, at least not to those who bothered to scratch the surface about his background. Bingo. I think I have swerved into an essential part of the analysis. It seems obvious that no one who had even a nodding acquaintance with Barack Obama’s voting record, his writings, and his Amerika-hating friends, and who considered that he was a product of the corrupt Cook County political machine by way of ACORN, could have considered voting for this man, unless of course, the voter’s goal was the destruction of the America we have known and loved.

So haven’t we answered our own question? We (1) knew that Barack Obama was a radical who described the U.S. Constitution as document of “negative rights,” meaning that he considered its system of limited federal power an obstacle to his grand plans and (2) understood the implications of that fact; specifically, we connected those dots, which lead to the inevitable understanding that a government big enough to give us everything we want is also big enough to take everything we have. That’s why we could never have supported Barack Obama and put him in the position to do the damage he continues to do to our great nation. Those who I have called the “low information” voters since 2009 were different. They didn’t see any problem with voting for this “cool” “historic” figure. Presto-the Left’s 100-year project of dumbing down the population through the public education system produced their ultimate victory!

For decades, Hillsdale College has attempted to stand against the Left’s promotion of ignorance in the service of socialism. It is devoted to making sure that the next generation does appreciate and revere our Constitution, and one of its best, economics professor Gary Wolfram has written a new book designed to push back the frontiers of ignorance. “The Capitalist Manifesto” does what I thought was impossible: making economics, specifically free market economics, not only accessible, but interesting. He’ll join us to explain what we can do to reach the Lo-Fos and take back our country.

Barack Obama continues to travel around the country lying about ”universal background checks” for gun purchases. He says we should feel ashamed for not supporting his idiotic, pointless gun control agenda. I say he should be ashamed for trying to use murdered children to trample on the rights of law abiding citizens. What say you? More in our 2nd Amendment update.

Is there a deal on “comprehensive immigration reform?” Sen. Chuck Schumer says “yes,” but Sen. Marco Rubio, also a member of the “Gang of Eight,” who have been working on the issue, isn’t so sure

The White House remains closed to the public, so no tours for any of the little people lucky enough to afford a spring break vacation to D.C. Our Dear Reader was forced to cut 2% from the increases in his profligate spending by that scary sequester, and so now the peasants must pay. Meanwhile, the Obama daughters enjoy the “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous,” apparently doing the “sun and ski” package favored by the likes of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. First, petting dolphins and partying at “Club Crush” at the luxurious Atlantis Resort in the Bahamas, then, because since when in one vacation enough for any member of the Obama family,  a Sun Valley ski trip. How much did these trips, with the private jets, the Secret Service agents and other miscellaneous expenses, cost taxpayers? We know that Malia Obama’s Mexico spring break getaway last year cost us over $115, 000. And how was YOUR spring break, Bitter Clinger?

Tune in today for the rest of the story.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Politics, Pop Culture, the Hottest Issues of the Day, and Your calls. The Teri O’Brien Show, featuring America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess, Live and in color, Sundays 4-6 pm Central time  at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Teri-OBrien. Daring to Commit Common Sense, Fearlessly, and More Important, Cheerfully, in the Age of Obama.

Make My Day: Text “FAN TOBCWP” to 32665

Can’t listen live? Download it from iTunes and listen on demand. 

As one listener wrote “one of the most insightful and entertaining pundits in America. Also, her voice is magical.”

Serious Ideas, Irresistible Entertainment. Warning: listeners may become hopelessly addicted.

Shared Sacrifice? How Much is This Latest Obama Vacation Boondoggle Costing Us?

From Breitbart:

Sasha and Malia Obama are quietly vacationing at the Atlantis resort on Paradise Island in the Bahamas, Breitbart News has learned.

A source tipped Breitbart News off to the First Daughters’ spring vacation, which was not publicly announced or reported.

Breitbart subsequently confirmed President Barack Obama’s daughters’ trip with other sources. Both the White House and the Atlantis resort declined to confirm the report or comment, but another guest provided a photograph of Sasha and Malia at the resort.

Social media, including Twitter and Facebook, have also carried reports of the First Daughters’ presence at Atlantis. One person who is at the resort wrote: “Rumor confirmed: friends saw the first daughters with a gaggle of friends being escorted to the held elevator.”

Via Twitter, another person wrote: “Obama daughters at the same restaurant as me…in the bahamas.”

When you visit the Breitbart post, you’ll see a video news report, and photos of the Princesses’  motorcade.

What are you and your family doing from Spring Break?

The Obama Girls are Off Limits, Unless They Can Improve Their Parents’ Image

On yesterday’s show, during the segment in which I played the excellent responses by Texas Senator Ted Cruz to David “Howdy Doody” Gregory’s silly questions about the NRA ad exposing Obama as a phony, elitist limousine liberal, I mentioned this CNN report that I had seen earlier in the day. It aired again this morning. It was the usual slobbering drivel that you would expect, celebrating the wonderful family that the Obamas have managed to create, despite the stress of living at a level of luxury unheard of in all of human history. Here’s the portion, in which we learn–I hope the you are sitting down!–that Malia does her own laundry–Gasp! Also, we learn that they watch only 2 hours of television a week. I wish I could get away with that, but I watch so you don’t have to.

(By the way, was delicious to watch, and to hear, Sen. Cruz talk about the wealthy “outsourcing” their security right in the face of David “The Laws are for the little people” Gregory, so if you missed the show, please check it out.)

The Death of Liberalism with R. Emmett Tyrell, and (Ret.) Col. Lawrence Sellin on Serving an Ineligible Commander-in-Chief: Today on the Teri O’Brien Show

Yesterday, while out and about at a local mall, I overhead a mother explaining to her very young daughter, who was probably about 4 years old, why her daddy would be home tomorrow. The woman said that tomorrow is holiday when we remember all the soldiers who died so that we can be free. I wanted to chase after her and hug her, and say “You are a wonderful mom, and great American,” but I decided I’d rather spend my weekend out of the slammer or the loony bin. My heart was in the right place, though. Memorial Day is the unofficial beginning of summer, and while it is a terrific time to relax with family, friends and enjoy delicious food and beverages, it should be first, last and always a day to commemorate the courage and selfless sacrifice of millions of members of the U.S. military that makes these celebrations possible. It’s essential that we convey that message to our children and grandchildren.

As we watch the disgusting spectacle of an unaccomplished, unqualified, affirmative-action assisted empty suit occupying the Oval Office and masquerading as a leader, we can only hope our long national nightmare will soon end. The desperation in the Obama campaign is obvious, from their doubling down on deceptive campaign ads about his profligate spending, to their unabashed playing the race card to appeal to the emotionally-driven perpetual adolescents who continue to support him, but is liberalism really kaput? That’s the thesis of the latest book from conservative icon, and founder of the American Spectator, R. Emmett Tyrell, in his new book, The Death of Liberalism. Is it too soon to celebrate? And what connection does he have to Chicago’s infamous Haymarket riot?

We’re also delighted and honored to have (Ret.) Colonel Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D, columnist for Family Security Matters stop by to reflect on Memorial Day from the perspective of one who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and who questions Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president because he is not an Article II “natural born citizen.” How did that fact affect his service in the military? Why does what he calls “possibly the greatest constitutional crisis since the Civil War” continue to be at best mocked, and at worst, ignored by the vast majority of the media, including supposedly conservative outlets?

Plus a special Second Amendment Update: Military Edition.

The latest on Michelle’s excellent adventures, and the story that the Lame Stream Media scrubbed about one of the Obama princesses.

Tune in today for the rest of the story.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks to all of you who voted for the Teri O’Brien Show as Talk Show of the Year on Red State Talk Radio. We won! We really appreciate your encouragement and livepage.apple.comsupport!

Politics, Pop Culture, the Hottest Issues of the Day, and Your calls. The Teri O’Brien Show, featuring America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess, Live and in color, Sundays 4-6 pm Central time  at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Teri-OBrien. Daring to Commit Common Sense, Fearlessly, and More Important, Cheerfully, in the Age of Obama.

Make My Day: Text “FAN TOBCWP” to 32665

Can’t listen live? Download it from iTunes and listen on demand. 

As one listener wrote “one of the most insightful and entertaining pundits in America. Also, her voice is magical.”

 

Serious Ideas, Irresistible Entertainment. Warning: listeners may become hopelessly addicted.


Subsidizing the Hight Cost of College for the Children of Millionaires, the Obama Daughters

For the last several months, Barack Obama has been criss-crossing the country inveighing against the outrageous failure of the evil rich to pay their “fair share” of taxes, and promoting the “Buffett rule,” which in itself is silly and laughable, and is made even more so by the fact that Mr. Buffett’s company, Berkshire Hathaway, is admits to owing back taxes back to 2002.

With the release of the Obamas’ latest tax return, we learn that:

(1) He probably paid a lower tax rate than his secretary. I say “probably” because the most recent data is from a former secretary, Katie Johnson, who now attends Harvard Law School, and what we know about her seems to come from Wikipedia. Apparently, the most transparent White House in history hasn’t seen fit to tell us much about Obama’s Gal Friday. From White House Dossier:

Obama’s federal income tax rate was 20.5 percent. If you include the Medicare and Social Security taxes paid by Obama, his total federal tax liability is 21.8 percent, fully two percent less than that of his secretary even though his adjusted gross income was nearly nine times hers.

Uh-oh.

Since I recognize that the talking points about  ”the income inequality gap” and “fairness” for the crypto-commie crap it is, I’m not that concerned about that, but I do note the silence about it from our friends on the Left. But then, there’s this …

(2) What does frost my behind is realizing that we are not only subsidizing the luxurious vacations, celebrity-studded soirees, the full-time makeup artist and the personal trainer flown in from Chicago, and other essential for Her Excellency, we are also subsidizing the future college educations of the Obama daughters to the tune of $48,000, so far. From Free Beacon:

President Obama and his wife, Michele, gave a total of $48,000 in tax-free gifts to their daughters, according to tax records made public on Friday.

The president and his wife separately gave each daughter a $12,000 gift under a section of the federal tax code that exempts such donations from federal taxes.

There is nothing illegal about the president’s taking advantage of this tax shelter, but it does raise eyebrows given that he has lamented the myriad tax exemptions used by the wealthy—“millionaires and billionaires” like himself—to pay less in taxes. He has yet to propose a comprehensive plan to reform the byzantine tax code.

The Obama’s tax return indicates that the gifts, likely for their daughter’s college educations, began in 2007, when the maximum exemptible amount was $24,000 per couple. The maximum exemption has since increased to $26,000 per couple.

So we are “giving” Barack and Michelle $48,000 in the form of “tax cuts for rich.” What, say you, Obama apologist? It’s their money, and the deduction is perfectly legal? Precisely, which is why we need genuine tax reform to reward achievement and job growth, not foolishness like the “Buffett rule,” promoted by a couple of buffoonish hypocrites like B.Hussein Obama and Warren “Tax Me More Even Though I Don’t Even Pay What I Owe” Buffett.