Valentine’s Day Inspires Pro-Abort Insanity, and Some Common Sense Advice for Young Women; That is, Find a Husband

Ladies, can you imagine anything more romantic? (H/T Truth Revolt)


For the last 40 years, bitter, angry feminists, whose personalities, haircuts and sensible shoes provide more birth control than a truckload of condoms, have sold young women a bill of goods. Misery loves company, after all, and since they were never going to have husbands, why should anyone else know what it’s like to be loved, honored and cherished by men who are willing to slay dragons for us? Better to convince them, as one angry feminist once told me, that being a wife is a “slave status,” and that the key to “liberation” is hitting the sheets with as many guys as possible, knowing that they can get rid of any inconvenient tissue mass that might result. Wait-who does that benefit? Men or women?

Maybe women are stupid after all, like all those sexist male chavinist pigs were supposedly saying all along!

Meanwhile, over at the Wall Street Journal, Susan Patton, author of  ”Marry Smart: Advice for Finding ‘The One,’ dares to speak truth to the Stalinist feminist cabal that dominates the legacy media and academia:

Another Valentine’s Day. Another night spent ordering in sushi for one and mooning over “Downton Abbey” reruns. Smarten up, ladies.

Despite all of the focus on professional advancement, for most of you the cornerstone of your future happiness will be the man you marry. But chances are that you haven’t been investing nearly as much energy in planning for your personal happiness as you are planning for your next promotion at work. What are you waiting for? You’re not getting any younger, but the competition for the men you’d be interested in marrying most definitely is.

Think about it: If you spend the first 10 years out of college focused entirely on building your career, when you finally get around to looking for a husband you’ll be in your 30s, competing with women in their 20s. That’s not a competition in which you’re likely to fare well. If you want to have children, your biological clock will be ticking loud enough to ward off any potential suitors. Don’t let it get to that point.

You should be spending far more time planning for your husband than for your career—and you should start doing so much sooner than you think. This is especially the case if you are a woman with exceptionally good academic credentials, aiming for corporate stardom.

So true! Ms. Patton is spot on. By the time many young women figure out what happened, they are bitter, 40-somethings wondering why they guys they once rejected during college and right after, but now consider marriage material are buying engagement rings for their 25 year-old girlfriends. She even dares to speak the ultimate heresy:

College is the best place to look for your mate. It is an environment teeming with like-minded, age-appropriate single men with whom you already share many things. You will never again have this concentration of exceptional men to choose from.

When you find a good man, take it slow. Casual sex is irresistible to men, but the smart move is not to give it away. If you offer intimacy without commitment, the incentive to commit is eliminated. The grandmotherly message of yesterday is still true today: Men won’t buy the cow if the milk is free. (emphasis mine)

That’s as true today as it was in 1920 and 1950. Try as might, feminists can’t rewrite the laws of nature. They can’t even manage to get decent haircuts most of the time.

Seriously Chelsea? You Wish You Had Never Been Born?

Chelsea to Libya

Is it that bad, Chelsea? From Life News:


From the stage at the recent Women Deliver conference, former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s daughter Chelsea revealed that her much-admired maternal grandmother was the child of unwed teenage parents who “did not have access to services that are so crucial that Planned Parenthood helps provide.”

She should be grateful that those Planned Parenthood killers didn’t have access to grandma!

Now, if I could invent a time machine and make sure that Stanley Ann Dunham had had access to today’s Planned Parenthood, I’m not sure what I would do. How about you?

Obama Embraces Favorite Liberal Strategy: “It’s For The Children”

Also posted at ClashDaily

Barack Obama continues to unashamedly use last December’s murder of 20 Connecticut children to advance his war on the 2nd Amendment, parachuting in to communities that have suffered mass shootings at the hands of lunatics to screech lies while using victims’ families as wallpaper. I guess these people haven’t suffered enough. Earlier this week in Hartford, CT, they had to endure hearing the Dear Reader recite the following from his Prompter:

 “This is not about me. This is not about politics. This is about preventing this from happening again. This is not about politics. This is about these families.”

There are very few statements that always true, that are indisputable 100% of the time. I am about to share one of those rare gems with you now, so listen up. When someone who emerged from the stinking slough of corruption that is the Chicago political machine tells you “this is not about politics,” you can be absolutely sure that it cannot possibly be about anything else. It’s like when someone tells you “it’s not about the money.” That statement is how you know that’s all it’s about.

Barack Obama and his allies hope that the soccer mommies, devoted viewers of “Inside Edition,” and “The View,” and similar members of the low-information cohort will be convinced by his phony and politically-motivated posturing that his latest attempt to gain more power over every single aspect of American life results from his concern for “the children.” It’s always “for the children,” isn’t it? Whenever liberals want to take away your money and your freedom, they become obsessed with “the children.” As touching as that sentiment is, I’m having a difficult time reconciling Barack Obama’s current obsession with those sweet little Newtown tots, and with protecting all the other children in America, with some of his policies, which demonstrate anything but concern for children. In fact, they show outright contempt for them.

Exhibit A-He’s OK with Infanticide

Barack Obama, this supposed defender of the innocent, holds views on abortion that are beyond extreme. While he was an Illinois state senator, he voted not once, not twice, but three times against bills requiring that babies fortunate enough to survive late-term abortions, who didn’t, to use his charming turn of phrase, come out “limp and dead,” be provided with medical care. He couldn’t support helping these innocent children because any suggestion that they were human beings might somehow infringe on “a woman’s right to choose.” Nothing must tarnish the precious liberal sacrament of abortion in Obama’s view. His slobbering sycophants in the Lame Stream Media managed to cover up his hideously militant pro-abort votes during his first presidential campaign. They had no interest in telling the American public that their chosen One had no problem with the murder of babies in 2007, 2008, or even in 2012. Apparently, the years haven’t inspired any increased interest in that issue, since there has been a virtual blackout on coverage of the murder trial of abortion butcher Kermit Gosnell. Leave it to the British press to shine a light on what The Daily Mail accurately calls a “house of horrors,”  The story describes testimony of medical assistant who claims he saw

“about 100 babies born alive and then ‘snipped’ with surgical scissors in the back of the neck, to ensure their ‘demise’.

He also spoke of the gruesome scenes at the clinic which was allegedly found dirty and rundown with rusting surgical instruments.

‘It would rain fetuses. Fetuses and blood all over the place. It is literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the body,’ he told NBC.”

During his recent Hartford clinic on demagoguery, Barack Obama whipped up the crowd’s emotions by decrying the “154 bullets” fired into the Newtown victims. Yet, he has remained silent about the unimaginable cruelty and butchery alleged in the abortuaries that he enthusiastically supports, because the question of when a baby acquires civil rights is “above [his] pay grade.

Exhibit B-He Enthusiastically Supports Planned Parenthood

Given his adamant support for abortion, of course, Barack Obama is a huge fan of America’s Number One abortion provider, Planned Parenthood. He has threatened states that have the audacity to refuse to do business with them with a cut off of federal Medicaid funds. It’s a mutual admiration society. They poured $12 million into his 2012 campaign. Unfortunately, in addition to all the great work that Planned Parenthood does, all that “women’s health care,” they enable the statutory rape of underage girls.  Amazingly these children do not deserve a vote, according to our benevolent ruler, however, he does want to make sure that if they end up pregnant by one of the adult men who are using them like playthings, they aren’t “punished with a baby.”

Exhibit C-He Has “Evolved” on Traditional Marriage

Political correctness has made it heresy to state the obvious truth, but I will fearlessly do so now. The ideal situation for a child is to be raised in the home with the man and woman who created him in wedlock. We have reached the end of the descent into the moral sewer that began with the Left’s 40-year campaign to destroy the traditional family, by demeaning marriage as “just a piece of paper,” and that end is so-called “same-sex marriage.” Barack Obama’s recent “evolving” on this issue exposes his ridiculous pontificating about valuing all families for the sake of the children as another phony politically motivated conversion. Is his support for redefining the building block of civilization about protecting children or protecting his party’s prospects in 2014? No one can claim to know what impact this radical departure from what we’ve always understood the term “marriage” to mean will have on children. No one knows, and most of us aren’t willing to take a chance. Can we say for sure that it will not encourage more cases like this one, involving a Connecticut “married” homosexual couple?

Given his radical, decades-long hostility toward the 2nd Amendment, and his lack of concern for the children who suffer as a result of liberal policies, Barack Obama’s disgusting and very transparent attempt to climb on top the corpses of murdered children and boldly proclaim that their deaths made him realize that we need to “do something” about gun violence would be laughable if it weren’t so disgusting.

Good News Day for Pedophiles: Push for “Morning After Pills” for 12 year olds

From the Washington Times:

Pro-choice activists said Tuesday they are preparing another push to lobby the Obama administration to loosen restrictions on “emergency contraception” for women of any reproductive age.

Some 40 organizations are planning to make their case to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius this week, Kirsten Moore, president and chief executive of the Reproductive Health Technologies Project, said in a media briefing.

“This coalition feels the time is now to read the science and the evidence supporting nonprescription access to emergency contraception,” Ms. Moore said at the briefing organized by RH Reality Check, a site that bills itself as “committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights.”

These products “are safe enough and appropriate enough to be on the shelf — right between the condoms and the pregnancy-test kits,” she said.

Thanks to the courageous, undercover work of Lila Rose and Live Action, we know that one of Barack Obama’s favorite organizations, Planned Parenthood, enthusiastically enables adult men who want to sexually-exploit underage girls. This rule change would give these perverts another avenue to use and degrade these children.

Of course it must be a good idea. The U.N. is all for it. 

What the Fluke? Rush Apologizes for Slut Remark About Dem Activist: Show Notes, 3/4/12

Rush Limbaugh Issues a Rare Apology

Last week the radio legend apologized for referring to leftwing activist/operative masquerading as an innocent law student Sandra Fluke (rhymes with WTF) as a “slut” and a “prostitute.” Regardless of whether those words apply, here are some that definitely do: “moocher” “shill” “liberal activist,” who is suddenly 30 years old, not 23, and who deliberately attended Georgetown so she could challenge the Catholic university’s policy on paying for contraceptives and abortifacients. So many questions:

  • Why is the word “slut,” which is often used as a badge of honor by feminists during their “slutwalks,” suddenly an horrific insult?
  • Should Rush have apologized?
  • Why did he do it?
  • Are you upset with Rush for playing into the Left’s hands by allowing the public debate to be, not about the actual issue of the coercion required to implement Obamacare, but the phony issue of “access to contraception?”
  • Is Barack Obama really sure Sandra Fluke’s parents’ are proud of her for publicly demanding that others pay for her contraception? If I had done that while in law school, my dad would have killed himself, or killed me, or both. I know he doesn’t want Sasha or Malia “punished” with a baby, but seriously?

A Statement from Rush – The Rush Limbaugh Show

Limbaugh apologizes for making slurs about Georgetown student – Washington Times


Rush apologizes, who will be next? – Illinois Review

SlutWalk rallies to give voice to sexual assault victims | The Daily Texan

SlutWalk Tampa September 17, 2011

I share my experience in terrestrial broadcasting, in which it didn’t escape my attention that those who say the most outrageous things seem to have very successful careers in that medium. Did it hurt Howard Stern? Michael Savage?

Hear what our smart callers had to say about that.

Are you a closet Romney suppporter?

Not surprisingly, Ms. Fluke is Chris Matthews’ new crush, and, yes, Chris, she is getting the Anita Hill treatment, as in, since the Left cannot win in the arena of ideas, they resort to character assassination and intimidation to silence their opponents.

Producer Thomas wonders if Bill Clinton has called her yet.

At least Obama has his priorities straight

Obama to Hit a Fund-Raising Milestone –

Obama Hits 100th Fundraiser on $5M New York City Haul – ABC News

The stunning death of Andrew Breitbart, and the three lessons we can learn from his short, but very effective, life

MUST HEAR: Newt takes it to NBC’s David “Howdy Doody” Gregory on “Meet The Press.”

Critiquelator’s report on Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation into B. Hussein’s eligibility to hold the office of President.

Mouchelle Update: Race-obsessed Chicago Sun-Times columnist Mary Mitchell explains that before the First Klingon arrived on the scene, black women couldn’t feel completely comfortable being themselves.

2nd Amendment Update

Five year-old draws a picture of her dad shooting monsters and bad guys in school. Dad ends up hand-cuffed and strip searched. Coming soon to the U.S.?

IGOLD (Illinois Gun Owners’ Lobby Day) is this Wednesday, March 7. With 2 very anti-freedom, anti-2nd amendment bills currently before the Illinois legislature, we need to have our voices heard

Arrested dad wants answers after daughter draws gun pic | Canada | News | Toronto Sun

House panel approves handgun registration, ammo tax bills – .Polls –

Beiser slams gun control bills | gun, illinois, chicago – The Telegraph

Illinois Gun Owners Lobby Day 2012

Terror at the Gas Pump

On ABC’s “This Week,” Sleazy Obama mouthpiece David Axelrod lies about domestic energy production and says that “of course” the Regime wants lower oil prices. Really? Then why did its Secretary of Energy, just like week, say that was not their goal? Should Chu be fired?

“Contraceptive” Controversy Should Remind You of Death Panels: Show Notes, 2-12-12

Where is Kathleen "as the Secretary shall determine" Sebelius? Is it time to put her picture on a milk carton?

“Contraception” controversy has nothing to do with contraception. It’s about coercion. The so-called “compromise” is a ridiculous accounting gimmick that fools no one. At best, it allows “progressive” Catholics to pretend that there isn’t an inherent conflict between what the Regime demands and their faith requires. It’s an “accommodation,” as in the benevolent government elects to let you do something, sort of like when your dad lets you stay out past your curfew.

The bishops aren’t buying it. I hope they realize now what a mistake it was to make a deal with the devil by pushing Obamacare in the first place.

Sister Carol Keehan visited White House 15 times « A Blog for Dallas Area Catholics

The Coalition that Gave Us Obamacare Is Back – By Kathryn Jean Lopez – The Corner – National Review Online

Both Catholic Health Assn and Planned Parenthood Say They’re Pleased With Contraception Rule Announcement – ABC News

Remember those death panels?

With Obama’s budget coming out tomorrow, it’s a good time to revisit his plan to save big bucks with the IPAB, the Independent Payment Advisory Board. Can you say “death panel?” Must read: piece from last April by one-time Teri O’Brien Show guest, Stanley Kurtz.

Now this makes sense.

Gee, wasn’t it amazing coincidence right before the New Hampshire Debate, when dem apparatchik/ “objective journalist” George Stephanopoulos grilled Mitt Romney about contraception, which at the time didn’t seem like America’s number one issue? We played one of the soundbites during this show. (On the January 8 edition of the Teri O’Brien Show, we wondered why Georgie was like a dog with a bone with issue, and played the whole exchange.)

Critiquelator weighs in on this kerfuffle.

Does this woman really need to worry about contraception? Seriously?

Two Questions: (1) The Regime sent new WH chief of staff Jacob Lew out to all the Sunday Shows to defend Obamacare. Where is Kathleen “as the Secretary shall determine” Sebelius? Should we put her face on a milk carton? (2) As I asked back when I keynoted an Illinois Right to LIfe Dinner, why are women like Barbara Mikulski obsessed with contraception and abortion? What are they afraid of, an unfortunate accident with a loaded turkey baster?

Straight from the Hart

Our special guest nationally-syndicated columnist, best-selling author, and relationship expert, Betsy Hart, made a pre-Valentine’s Day visit to discuss today’s hookup culture, and whether we have any chance of getting back to the quaint notion of courtship. Please check out Betsy’s terrific new e-book, From The Hart: on Love, Loss, Marriage (and Other Extreme Sports) eBook: Betsy Hart: Kindle Store, a refreshingly intelligent, entertaining dose of common sense.

Also:Hart: Women ask for too much and settle for too little It Takes a Parent : How the Culture of Pushover Parenting Is Hurting Our Kids–and What to Do About It: Betsy Hart: Books

All the Single Ladies – Magazine – The Atlantic (daughter of feminist mother, now approaching 40, regrets her choice to forego marriage)

2nd Amendment Update

Emanuel wants Illinois gun registry – Chicago Tribune

Where are the stories about Dick Durbin’s Abortion Flip Flop?

Liberal Death Star explores Mitt Romney’s evolving views on abortion, but what about the cover up of Dick “Eddie Haskell” Durbin’s stunning, and purely politically cynical, turnaround on this issue?

Darth Durbin (excellent piece by Jill Stanek on Durbin’s politically motivated flip flop)

Excerpt from NBC News’ Meet the Press (unintentionally hilarious explanation by Eddie himself about why he did a 180 on the life issue; that is, the U.S. Constitution, which he previously had written did not contain a right to abortion, changed because pro-lifers are so mean.)

Women Expect Too Much and Settle for Too Little: Today on the Teri O’Brien Show

With Valentine’s Day approaching, it’s a good time to ask the question: Is romance dead? The recent controversy over federally-mandated “free” contraception, deemed “essential preventative care” by the Obama regime, raises a more subtle question. Is the notion of “courtship,” now as quaint as the parasol, replaced by hookup, and if so, who benefits? The late 1960‘s saw the rise of so-called women’s movement, but has it really benefitted women? Are we better off now that “liberation” means that we’re supposed to not only pick up the check, but also hit the sheets with as many men as possible, get rid of any inconvenient tissue mass byproducts of our sexual conquests, and move on to the next one? Of course not, and while it might seem like our culture’s sexual candy store might be a dream come true for men, as they mature, aren’t they also looking for something deeper and more meaningful?

Our special guest, nationally-syndicated columnist and author of the best-selling book, It Takes a Parent, Betsy Hart, will join us to talk about looking for love in all the right places. Her new book “From The Hart: A Collection of Favorite Columns on Love, Loss, Marriage (and Other Extreme Sports)” is a refreshingly honest, intelligent, and sometimes politically incorrect, exploration of modern relationships. Betsy will explain the real reason that women seem to have such a tough time finding Mr. Right, often ignoring many good guys in the process. She’s also agreed to take your questions about love and romance. I’ll ask her about a recent CPAC attendee’s idea of the perfect conservative date.

The Obama administration has decided that the issue of federal government coercion, laid bare by their insistence that birth control, including abortifacients, are a “right,” is behind them, but not so fast, my dictatorial friends. Nothing is over until we say it is.

Join us Sunday for the rest of the story.


Thanks to all of you who voted for the Teri O’Brien Show as Talk Show of the Year on Red State Talk Radio. We won! We really appreciate your encouragement and support!

Politics, Pop Culture, the Hottest Issues of the Day, and Your calls. The Teri O’Brien Show, featuring America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess, Live and in color, Sundays 4-6 pm Central time  at Daring to Commit Common Sense, Fearlessly, and More Important, Cheerfully, in the Age of Obama.

Make My Day: Text “FAN TOBCWP” to 32665

Can’t listen live? Download it from iTunes and listen on demand.

As one listener wrote “one of the most insightful and entertaining pundits in America. Also, her voice is magical.”

Serious Ideas, Irresistible Entertainment. Warning: listeners may become hopelessly addicted.