White House to Bob Woodward: You Will Regret Criticizing the One

I tweeted this morning about liberal media hero Bob Woodward’s appearance this morning on MS-NBC’s “Morning Joe.”

Woodward decries Obama madness on Morning Joe

Woodward decries Obama madness on Morning J

 

 

 

From Politico:

The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward attacked President Barack Obama on Wednesday, saying the commander-in-chief’s decision not to deploy an aircraft carrier because of budget cuts is “a kind of madness.”

“Can you imagine Ronald Reagan sitting there and saying, ‘Oh, by the way, I can’t do this because of some budget document?’” Woodward said Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”“Or George W. Bush saying, ‘You know, I’m not going to invade Iraq because I can’t get the aircraft carriers I need’ or even Bill Clinton saying, ‘You know, I’m not going to attack Saddam Hussein’s intelligence headquarters,’ as he did when Clinton was president because of some budget document?” Woodward added. “Under the Constitution, the president is commander-in-chief and employs the force. And so we now have the president going out because of this piece of paper and this agreement. ‘I can’t do what I need to do to protect the country.’ That’s a kind of madness that I haven’t seen in a long time.”

The Dear Reader’s regime is not going to take this sitting down! So they threatened the legendary journo. This evening on CNN, Bob Woodward told Wolf Blitzer that the White House had threatened him. From Business Insider:

Bob Woodward said this evening on CNN that a “very senior person” at the White House warned him in an email that he would “regret doing this,” the same day he has continued to slam President Barack Obama over the looming forced cuts known as the sequester.

Mr. Hope, Change and Soaring Rhetoric turns out to be another slimeball Chicago politician. Who’da thunk it?

When the Going Gets Tough, the Lazy Phone it In. Obama Administration Issues Identical Statement on Jobs Reports 5 Months in a Row

Seriously? You guys can’t even write something original about the monthly jobs numbers? Even we bloggers manage to scribble something different when commenting on different stories. But wait, this isn’t a different story, is it? It’s the same story of economic stagnation, month after month after miserable month in Obama’s economy where this is–to use another annoying threadbare LSM clichè–the “new normal.” From today’s Washington Post, the Regime’s comment on the anemic jobs report issued today:

“While more work remains to be done, today’s employment report provides further evidence that the U.S. economy is continuing to heal from the wounds inflicted by the worst downturn since the Great Depression,” said Alan Krueger, the chief White House economist, in a statement Friday morning.

Gee, that sounds familiar …Oh wait, I know why. From the White House, after the release of November, 2012 job numbers.

While more work remains to be done, today’s employment report provides further evidence that the U.S. economy is continuing to heal from the wounds inflicted by the worst downturn since the Great Depression.

 

And then October, 2012 job numbers:

While more work remains to be done, today’s employment report provides further evidence that the U.S. economy is continuing to heal from the wounds inflicted by the worst downturn since the Great Depression.

And check out the report after release of July 2012 job numbers and August 2012  job numbersGee, I wonder what the release about September, 2012 job numbers said?

You have to understand. The White House statement issuers were using all their mental energy and creativity dreaming up stories to tell us about what happened in Benghazi. They can’t be expected to actually explain anything as trivial as the continuing pathetically high rates of unemployment and under-employment.

Do you think of their Lame Stream Media stenographers will notice or point it out to their perennially-in-the-dark audiences?

Surf’s up!